It has been accepted by later generations of people without anyone questioning or examining it in light of the internal facts of the book itself. ![]() ![]() We scholars know that scribal errors were so common in antiquity that the author of the Book of Revelation threatened damnation to anyone who "adds' or takes away words from the text. It began with oral claims of miracles, and narratives. On the contrary, the New Testament was created by means of the teachings and growth. It is for me a matter of "Tradition vs Truth " Christianity was not born out of the possession of the New Testament. I for one am not willing to be as one of my Jewish colleague has written "To follow one is to a clone" Nor am I willing to be labeled a "heretic" because I don't just fall into line with everyone. We show that it is the only evidence used to support the "late date" theory of Revelation's authorship. ![]() ![]() There are three main subjects we examine One is the external evidence that comes from Polycarp's statement, with all of its uncertainty.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |